Cloud Computing vs. Fog Computing: Key Differences
Advertisement
This article compares cloud computing and fog computing, highlighting their differences in terms of latency, security, location awareness, and more. A tabular comparison is also provided for quick reference.
Introduction
Cloud computing has become a staple for processing, analyzing, and storing data from client devices. However, with the rapid expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT), the sheer volume of data generated daily presents new challenges. Projections estimated around 50 billion IoT devices connected by 2020. The traditional cloud computing model struggles to handle this massive influx due to latency, bandwidth limitations, and overall scalability concerns. Fog computing emerged as a solution to address these shortcomings.
What is Cloud Computing?
Cloud computing models
Cloud computing provides convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable resources, including servers, network infrastructure, storage, and applications. Key features include:
- Essential features, service models, and deployment models.
- Accessibility from anywhere, at any time.
- A direct communication model where end devices interact directly with cloud servers and storage, without an intermediary fog layer.
- Various deployment models based on ownership, size, and access, such as public, private, hybrid, community, multi-cloud, and distributed cloud.
- Service models like Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Software as a Service (SaaS).
- Public Cloud: Accessible to the public and owned by a third-party provider, like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, or Google Compute Engine.
- Private Cloud: Owned by a single organization, allowing centralized access to IT resources.
What is Fog Computing?
Fog computing architecture
Fog computing extends the cloud closer to the data-generating devices. These devices, known as fog nodes, possess network connectivity, storage, and computing capabilities. Examples include switches, controllers, routers, servers, and cameras. Fog computing is often used interchangeably with edge computing. Its primary applications include:
- Analyzing time-sensitive data at the network edge, minimizing latency by processing data near its source.
- Sending selected data to the cloud for in-depth analysis and long-term storage.
- Serving a large number of devices distributed across a wide geographical area.
- Supporting devices operating in extreme conditions.
Difference between Cloud Computing and Fog Computing
The following table summarizes the key differences between cloud computing and fog computing:
Requirements | Cloud Computing | Fog Computing |
---|---|---|
Latency | High | Low |
Delay Jitter | High | Very Low |
Location of Service | Within the Internet | At the edge of the local network |
Distance (Client/Server) | Multiple hops | One hop |
Security | Undefined | Can be defined |
Attack on data enroute | High probability | Very low probability |
Location awareness | No | Yes |
Geo-distribution | Centralized | Distributed |
No. of server nodes | Few | Very large |
Support for mobility | Limited | Supported |
Real-time interactions | Supported | Supported |
Last mile connectivity | Leased Line | Wireless |
Table Reference: https://blogs.cisco.com/
Here are additional key differences:
-
Data Processing Location:
- Cloud computing: Data and applications are processed in a centralized cloud, which can be time-consuming for large datasets.
- Fog computing: Operates on the network edge, reducing processing time.
-
Bandwidth Usage:
- Cloud computing: Can suffer from bandwidth issues due to transmitting all data over cloud channels.
- Fog computing: Reduces bandwidth demand by aggregating data at access points before sending it to the cloud.
-
Response Time and Scalability:
- Cloud computing: May experience slow response times and scalability issues due to reliance on remote servers.
- Fog computing: Edge servers, located closer to users, mitigate response time and scalability problems.