RFLVDS vs. TTL: Key Differences in Data Transmission
Advertisement
This article breaks down the differences between LVDS (Low Voltage Differential Signaling) and TTL (Transistor-Transistor Logic), two common data transmission signaling methods. While conversion between LVDS and TTL is possible, their interfaces are inherently incompatible. Let’s dive into a detailed comparison:
LVDS vs. TTL: A Side-by-Side Comparison
| Specification | LVDS (Low Voltage Differential Signaling) | TTL (Transistor-Transistor Logic) |
|---|---|---|
| Full Form | Low Voltage Differential Signaling | Transistor-Transistor Logic |
| Binary Coding Logic | Uses two wires with the voltage difference between them determining whether the data is a zero (0) or a one (1). | Uses the presence or absence of voltage with reference to ground to determine binary 1 or 0. |
| Power Consumption | Less | More |
| Merit/Demerit | Employs twisted pairs, creating tight EM field coupling. Differential voltage from spikes remains constant, mitigating EMI effects. This is a major advantage. | A binary zero can be misinterpreted as a binary one at the receiver due to voltage spikes. This is a significant drawback compared to LVDS. |
| Distance | Supports higher transmission distances. | Supports lower transmission distances. |
| Mode of Transmission | Uses serial mode, requiring fewer wires. | Uses parallel mode, requiring more wires. |
| Reference Point | Does not use ground as a reference signal. | Uses ground as a reference signal. |
| Use of Lower Voltage Levels | Uses lower voltage levels. | Does not use lower voltage levels. |
| Resistance against Interference | More resistant. | Less resistant. |
Key Takeaways from the Comparison
-
Noise Immunity: LVDS excels in noisy environments due to its differential signaling and tighter EM field coupling. Any voltage spikes affect both wires equally, preserving the voltage difference representing the data. TTL, relying on a single voltage referenced to ground, is more susceptible to noise.
-
Distance: LVDS is designed for longer distances, making it suitable for applications where the transmitter and receiver are far apart. TTL is typically used for shorter distances.
-
Wiring Complexity: LVDS employs serial transmission, reducing the number of wires needed. TTL’s parallel transmission requires more wires, increasing complexity and cost.
-
Power Consumption: LVDS generally consumes less power than TTL, making it a better choice for battery-powered devices or applications where power efficiency is critical.
