RFSigfox vs. Wireless-M Bus: A Comparative Analysis
Advertisement
Introduction
Sigfox and Wireless-M Bus are two well-known technologies in the world of IoT communication, and each shines in different scenarios. Sigfox is a global Low Power Wide Area Network (LPWAN) technology designed for ultra-low-power consumption and cost-effective data transfer. On the other hand, Wireless-M Bus is commonly used in metering applications, providing reliable communication for smart utilities.
This guide offers a comparison of their features, strengths, and ideal applications to help you decide which technology best suits your specific IoT needs.
Difference Between Sigfox and Wireless-M Bus
Here’s a breakdown of the key differences:
| Specifications | Sigfox | Wireless M-Bus |
|---|---|---|
| Usage (bytes per day) | less than 200 bytes/day (typical), 5 kbytes/day (maximum) | less than 200 bytes/day (typical), less than 50 kbytes/day (maximum) |
| Data Rate (Payload) | 10 to 100 bps (typical for one message) | 2.4 to 4.8 kbps (typical for one message), 19.2 kbps (max.) |
| Coverage Distance | 10 to 12 km (city areas), 40 to 60 Km (country side areas) | up to 1 Km (city areas), up to 7 Km (country side areas) |
| Frequency Bands | 433 MHz, 868 MHz, 915 MHz (<1 GHz) | 169 MHz |
| Link Budget | up to 170 dB (100 bps, 500 mWatt) | up to 150 dB (2.4 kbps, 500 mWatt) |
| Frame Size (Payload) | 12 bytes (typical) | 30 to 130 bytes (typical) |
| Latency | max. ms to seconds | ms to seconds |
| Applications | Telemetry and tracking, alarm, control, sensing | Smart metering |
| Unique Applications | Supports nomadic (across the cell) and mobility | Fixed network RF |
Conclusion
Both Sigfox and Wireless-M Bus have proven their value in their respective areas of expertise. Understanding their differences is crucial to selecting the most appropriate technology for your IoT project, whether your focus is on metering infrastructure or more general IoT connectivity applications.
