Neul vs NWave vs Sigfox: LPWAN Comparison

lpwan
iot
neul
nwave
sigfox

Introduction

Neul, NWave, and Sigfox are leading players in the LPWAN (Low Power Wide Area Network) domain, each offering unique approaches to IoT connectivity. While Neul leverages TV white spaces for long-range communication, NWave focuses on ultra-narrowband technology, and Sigfox provides a cost-efficient, cloud-centric model. This guide compares these technologies, detailing their features, advantages, and ideal use cases to help you understand which one fits your IoT project. All three are Low Power Wide Area Networks used in IoT (Internet of Things). They are used for low data rate communication, unlike cellular networks used for making calls and browsing the internet. Cellular networks are mostly used in urban environments, using radio spectrum which is purchased from telecom regulators.

What is Neul?

Neulnet-based networks use license-exempt UHF frequencies to provide wide-area coverage through trees and foliage into buildings. They cover a 10 km range with larger cells. The NeulNet-based wireless technology is used as rural broadband and private network backhaul. All Weightless-enabled devices can also be used for the Internet of Things (IoT).

What is NWave?

The NWave technology uses UNB (Ultra Narrow Band) along with SDR (Software Defined Radio) techniques to deliver a communication network for IoT. NWave networks operate in internationally available, as well as unlicensed, sub-1GHz bands. It allows deep signal propagation with little power consumption. The network coexists with other radio networks without any issues. They can use mesh/star topologies. The networks are scalable. In Star architecture, devices can communicate directly with the Base Station. The network is secure and hence user data are protected.

What is Sigfox?

  • Sigfox is the name of the French company that designs and develops wireless networks for low data rate communication.
  • Sigfox employs proprietary WAN which enables communication in the ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical) band.
  • It supports limited bi-directional communication.

Difference between Neul, NWave & Sigfox

SpecificationsNeulNWaveSigfox
Coverage rangeUp to 10 KmUp to 10 KmUp to 10 Km (Urban) About 30 to 50 Km (Rural)
Frequency BandISM or whitespaceSub GHz868 MHz (Europe) /915 MHz (USA)
Data Rate10 to 100 Kbps100 bps10 to 1000 bps
Fully bi-directionalYesNoNo
Operational modelPublic or PrivatePublic-
StandardWeightlessWeightlessETSI GS LTN 001, 002, 003 (Low Throughput Networks)

Conclusion

Neul, NWave, and Sigfox cater to distinct IoT connectivity scenarios, from extended range to ultra-low power communication. A clear understanding of their differences allows you to align the right technology with your project’s needs.

SigFox Uplink and Downlink Data Call Flow

SigFox Uplink and Downlink Data Call Flow

Explore the SigFox uplink and downlink data call flow procedure. Understand how devices, base stations, and backend systems interact for efficient IoT communication.

sigfox
lpwan
iot
LoRaWAN vs Sigfox: Key Differences in IoT Networks

LoRaWAN vs Sigfox: Key Differences in IoT Networks

Explore the differences between LoRaWAN and Sigfox technologies for IoT networks, focusing on network architecture, data rates, and applications to help you choose the best solution.

iot
lorawan
sigfox