RFZigbee vs. WiFi: A Comprehensive Comparison
Advertisement
This article delves into the differences between Zigbee and WiFi technologies, offering a comparison that’s particularly useful for understanding their respective applications. We’ll also touch upon how Zigbee stacks up against other IoT technologies. Both Zigbee and WiFi are commonly used in home automation and support security protocols.
Zigbee
Zigbee operates on the IEEE 802.15.4 standard. It has different physical layer versions for different frequency bands. It’s well-suited for low data rate home automation, especially for monitoring and control applications. Typical applications include light switches, smoke detectors, smart meters, and various sensors.
WiFi
WiFi is based on the IEEE 802.11 family of standards, including 802.11a, 11b, 11g, 11n, 11ac, 11ad, 11ah, and more. While initially designed to provide wireless connectivity to LAN-based devices, it has evolved to extend LAN coverage within buildings or between nearby buildings.
Continuous research and development in WLAN and cellular standards have bridged the gap between WiFi and cellular technologies. MiFi devices exemplify this, acting as a bridge between the two.
The IEEE 802.11ah standard is under development, and this WiFi version is considered compatible with Zigbee, often referred to as low-power Zigbee.
Key Differences and Similarities
Zigbee and WiFi are distinct technologies. Zigbee is WPAN (Wireless Personal Area Network) based, while WiFi is WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network) based. The table below highlights their similarities and differences:
| Specifications | Zigbee | WiFi |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | IEEE 802.15.4 and Zigbee Alliance | IEEE 802.11 series |
| Network Type | WPAN (Wireless Personal Area Network) | WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network) |
| Frequency Band | 868/915 MHz and 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz |
| Channel Bandwidth | About 1 MHz | 0.3 or 0.6 or 2 MHz |
| Network Topology | Star and mesh type | BSS, ESS configurations |
| Data Rate | Up to 250 Kbps (low data rate) | Up to 54 Mbps using 802.11a/g OFDM (even higher with newer standards) |
| Modulation Technique | BPSK, OQPSK | OFDM, CCK, BPSK, QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM, 256QAM |
| Typical Distance | 10 to 30 meters | 30 to 100 meters |
| Managed By | Zigbee Alliance and IEEE | WiFi Alliance and IEEE |
| Chip Cost | Lower cost than WiFi (at high volume) | Higher cost than Zigbee |
| Power Consumption | Lower than WiFi (e.g., 0.39W vs. 0.87W) | Higher than Zigbee |
| Transmit Power | -25 dBm to 0 dBm | 15 to 20 dBm |
| Data Protection | 16-bit CRC | 32-bit CRC |
| Applications | Home automation | Extension of cellular connection within the home |
| Chip Manufacturers | Freescale, Ember, Texas Instruments, Marvell, ATMEL, Microchip | Texas Instruments, Microchip, Redpine, Broadcom |
| RF Channels | 1 (868MHz), 10 (915MHz), 16 (2.4GHz) | 14 (2.4GHz band) |
Advertisement
