UWB vs Zigbee: Key Differences Explained
Advertisement
This article compares UWB (Ultra-Wideband) and Zigbee technologies, highlighting their differences across various parameters.
What is UWB?
UWB technology utilizes a wide spectrum, exceeding 500 MHz. In 2002, the FCC approved the unlicensed use of the 3.1 to 10.6 GHz range for UWB applications. UWB employs short-duration electromagnetic pulses to achieve high-speed data transfer across this wide bandwidth. It adheres to the IEEE 802.15.4a/z standard.
Thanks to its broad bandwidth, UWB supports high data rates (up to ~27 Mbps). It’s also favored for its low latency, minimal power consumption, and strong resistance to interference.
UWB Network
The image above illustrates a UWB network, featuring UWB anchors strategically placed. These anchors communicate with UWB tags, smartphones, lights, and even WiFi access points (APs). The WiFi AP, or router, connects to the cloud via a gateway. UWB technology facilitates target sensor data collection from various sensors like motion, temperature, and light sensors. It’s particularly useful for precise location and tracking applications.
What is Zigbee?
Zigbee is often preferred over WiFi and Bluetooth for connecting a large number of battery-powered devices. It’s a short-range wireless protocol operating on the IEEE 802.15.4 physical layer, utilizing the 2.4 GHz spectrum, similar to WiFi and Bluetooth. However, Zigbee operates at much lower data rates (20 Kbps to 250 Kbps).
Zigbee employs a mesh topology and routes data using the AODV protocol. Zigbee-enabled devices offer an indoor range of approximately 10-20 meters. For secure communication, Zigbee uses the 128-bit AES encryption algorithm. A Zigbee node requires about 30 seconds to join a network, compared to WiFi (~3 seconds) and Bluetooth (~10 seconds). It theoretically supports up to 65,000 devices (though practically, around 240 devices is more realistic). The Zigbee technology uses an open-source standard managed by the Zigbee Alliance.
Zigbee Mesh Network
Zigbee operates on three frequency bands: 868 MHz (Europe), 915 MHz (US, Australia), and 2.4 GHz (other countries). Within these bands, it uses different channels: channel 0 in 868 MHz, channels 1-10 in 915 MHz, and channels 11-26 in the 2.4 GHz band. During operation, Zigbee utilizes only one channel from this selection.
A Zigbee network consists of a Zigbee coordinator, routers, and end devices. Zigbee finds applications in home automation, medical data collection, industrial control systems, and more. It supports various topologies, including star, mesh, and tree.
Difference between UWB and Zigbee
The following table outlines the key differences between UWB and Zigbee across various parameters:
Features | UWB | Zigbee |
---|---|---|
Standard | IEEE 802.15.3a, IEEE 802.15.4, IEEE 802.15.4z | IEEE 802.15.4 |
Frequency | sub GHz (500 MHz), lower band (3.5 to 4.5 GHz) and higher band (6.5 GHz to 10 GHz) | 868/915 MHz, 2.4 GHz |
Range/Coverage | 10 meters | 10-100 meters |
Bandwidth | 500 MHz to 7.5 GHz | 0.3/0.6 MHz; 2 MHz |
Modulation | BPSK, QPSK | BPSK (+ ASK), O-QPSK |
Number of RF channels | 16 (0 to 15) | 1/10; 16 |
Nominal transmit power | -41.3 dBm/MHz | -25 dBm to 0 dBm |
Data Protection | 32 bit CRC | 16 bit CRC |
Latency | Low, in sub milliseconds range | High |
Power consumption | High | Medium |
Maximum Signal rate | 110 Mbps | 20/40 Kbps, 250 Kbps |
Spreading technique | DS-UWB, MB-OFDM | DSSS |
Basic cell architecture | Piconet | Star |
Coexistence mechanism | Adaptive frequency hopping | Dynamic frequency selection |
Extension of basic cell | Peer to peer | Cluster tree, mesh |
Maximum number of cell nodes | 8 | > 65000 |
Summary
In summary, UWB is suitable for positioning applications, low-latency communication, and low-power data transfer. Zigbee, on the other hand, is well-suited for smart home-based IoT applications that require a large number of nodes and a wider coverage range.