RFINSTEON vs X10: Key Differences Explained
Advertisement
This article provides a basic comparison between INSTEON and X10 technologies, highlighting their differences. INSTEON offers more advanced features compared to the older X10 powerline signaling technology. X10, invented by Pico Electronics, gained popularity in the 1970s. However, it suffered from several drawbacks that ultimately led to its decline.
The following table outlines the key differences between INSTEON and X10:
| Specifications | INSTEON | X10 |
|---|---|---|
| Medium of operation | Supports both Powerline and radio communication | Supports powerline communication |
| Addition of devices | INSTEON devices repeat each other’s messages, so adding more devices strengthens the signal. A more extensive network results in greater reliability. | Adding X10 devices weakens the network. |
| Loop type | Closed loop; devices can both listen and talk. The protocol requires acknowledgment for all non-broadcast messages. | Open loop; X10 communication lacks a built-in mechanism to verify message delivery from sender to receiver. |
| Speed of operation | Faster by a factor of 48 compared to X10 (sends 24 bits of information at each powerline zero crossing, once every 8.33 ms) | Slower (sends only 1/2 bit) |
| Address and command space | Supports 16 million addresses and 65 thousand commands | Supports 256 addresses and 16 commands |
| Device support | Utilizes a 24-bit pre-assigned module ID address, supporting 16,777,216 devices in a network | Supports 256 different X10 devices on a single powerline |
Advertisement
