USB 3.0 vs MIPI CSI-2: Interface Comparison

usb interface
mipi csi
interface
data transfer
embedded system

This page compares USB 2.0, USB 3.0, and MIPI CSI-2 interfaces, highlighting the differences between USB and MIPI CSI-2 interface types.

Introduction:

Embedded electronics require three key parameters for success in today’s market: low power consumption, small size, and low production costs.

To achieve these goals, System on Chip (SoC) designs have become prevalent. An SoC houses the core elements of a computer, such as the CPU, GPU, and buses. It also includes various interfaces like HDMI, GigE, USB, and MIPI.

Board-level camera modules are interfaced with processors using different interface types, including USB 2.0, USB 3.0, proprietary parallel or serial interfaces, and MIPI CSI-2.

USB 2.0 Interface

Here are the features of the USB 2.0 interface:

  • Released in 2000.
  • Frequently found on many SoCs.
  • Requires minimal additional hardware. A USB connector is needed to connect the camera to the SoC.
  • Supports a low bandwidth of up to 40 MB/s.
  • Not suitable for running high-resolution sensors at high speed.
  • Bidirectional data transfer is not supported. Smart charging is also unavailable.

USB 2.0 vs USB 3.0

USB 3.0 Interface

The following are the features of the USB 3.0 interface:

  • Released in 2008.
  • Supports high bandwidth, up to 360 MB/s.
  • Offers easy integration using the USB3 vision standard.
  • Offers a plug-and-play feature for easier integration in embedded applications.
  • Relatively lower in development costs.
  • Like USB 2.0, it requires bigger connectors and less flexible cables, making it unsuitable for space-constrained devices.
  • Available only for a few high-end SoCs.
  • Bidirectional data transfer is supported. Smart charging is also available.

MIPI CSI-2 Interface

Here are the features of the MIPI CSI-2 interface:

  • Developed by the MIPI Alliance.
  • CSI-2 stands for “Camera Serial Interface 2nd Generation.”
  • The most common interface for mobile applications, used to connect smartphone camera modules to an SoC.
  • SoCs provide up to 6 serial lanes.
  • Each lane provides bandwidth up to 300 MB/sec.
  • Allows high-resolution camera modules to operate at high speed.

MIPI-CSI-2-Combo-PHY

Tabular Difference between USB and MIPI CSI-2

The following table compares USB 2.0, USB 3.0, and CSI-2, highlighting the differences between the interfaces.

FeaturesUSB 2.0USB 3.0MIPI CSI-2
Availability on SoCOftenOn high-end SoCsMany, typically 6 lanes available
Bandwidth40 MB/s360 MB/s300 MB/s/lane
Cable Length< 5 meters< 5 meters< 30 cm
Space RequirementsHighHighLow
Plug and PlaySupportedSupportedNot supported
Development CostsLowLowMedium to High (manufacturer dependent)
Parallel Interface: Advantages and Disadvantages

Parallel Interface: Advantages and Disadvantages

Explore the pros and cons of parallel interfaces, including speed benefits and limitations like short-distance communication and increased complexity.

parallel interface
data communication
interface
RS485 Advantages and Disadvantages

RS485 Advantages and Disadvantages

Explore the pros and cons of RS485 serial communication, including distance, speed, noise immunity, and limitations like wiring complexity and data transfer.

rs485
serial communication
data transfer
UART: Advantages and Disadvantages

UART: Advantages and Disadvantages

Explore the benefits and drawbacks of UART (Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter) communication, its features, and applications.

uart
serial communication
asynchronous communication