LED Tube Types: A, B, and C Explained

led tube
led lighting
type a
type b
type c

LED lighting has exploded in popularity, thanks to its long lifespan, energy efficiency, and ease of control. But navigating the world of LED tubes can be a little confusing, especially when you start seeing terms like Type-A, Type-B, and Type-C. This article breaks down the differences between these LED tube types.

LED Tube Type-A

LED tube type-A

Features of LED tube type-A:

  • Uses an existing electronic ballast.
  • Operates on 100-277V AC at 50/60 Hz.
  • Requires ballast replacement during maintenance.
  • Considered to have a “risk of fire and electrical shock”.
  • Needs both ballast and lamp holder replacements.
  • Essentially, Type-A tubes are designed to be a relatively simple replacement for fluorescent tubes, utilizing the existing ballast.

LED Tube Type-B

LED tube type-B

Features of LED tube type-B:

  • Uses a magnetic ballast.
  • Operates on 100-277V AC at 50/60 Hz.
  • Designed to operate with an internal driver, but can also be directly connected to mains power.
  • Incoming power lines are directly connected to sockets, potentially exposing individuals to AC voltage.
  • Also carries a “risk of fire and electrical shock”.
  • Type-B tubes often bypass the ballast altogether, requiring some rewiring for direct connection to the mains.

LED Tube Type-C

LED tube type-C

Features of LED tube type-C:

  • Does not use any ballast.
  • Operates on 100-249V AC at 50/60 Hz.
  • Uses an external driver and requires a modified fixture compared to Type-A and Type-B.
  • Low voltage outputs from the driver are connected to sockets instead of the line voltage used in Type-A and Type-B.
  • Fixture input wires must be interfaced with the driver.
  • Type-C solutions use an external driver to power the LED tube which is a safer, low voltage option.

WSN vs. Ad Hoc Networks: Key Differences Explained

Explore the key differences between Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) and Ad Hoc Networks. Understand their distinct features, deployment scenarios, and limitations.

wireless sensor
ad hoc network
network comparison