RFBluetooth vs. Zigbee: Wireless PAN Technology Comparison
Advertisement
This article compares Bluetooth and Zigbee, two popular wireless Personal Area Network (PAN) technologies, highlighting their key differences.
Specifications: Bluetooth vs. Zigbee
The following table outlines the key specifications of Bluetooth and Zigbee:
| Feature | Bluetooth | Zigbee |
|---|---|---|
| IEEE Standard | 802.15.1 | 802.15.4 |
| RF Frequency Band | ISM bands (country-specific): | 868 MHz (Europe) |
| USA & Europe: 2400-2483.5 MHz | 915 MHz (Australia/USA) | |
| Japan: 2471-2479 MHz | 2450 MHz (Worldwide) | |
| France: 2445-2475 MHz | ||
| Spain: 2446.5-2483.5 MHz | ||
| Channel Spacing | 1 MHz | 5 MHz, Occupied bandwidth ~2 MHz |
| No. of Channels | USA & Europe: 79 | 16 (2450 MHz band) |
| Japan, France, Spain: 23 | 10 (915 MHz band) | |
| 1 (868 MHz band) | ||
| Distance | 10 cm to 100 meters (power class) | 10 to 100 meters (transmit power, antenna) |
| Data Rate | 1 Mbps (Bluetooth 1.0) | 20/40 Kbps (868/915 MHz) |
| Up to 3 Mbps (Bluetooth 2.0) | 250 Kbps (2450 MHz) | |
| Modulation | GFSK (Gaussian Frequency Shift Keying) | BPSK (Binary Phase Shift Keying) for 868/915 MHz |
| OQPSK (Orthogonal QPSK) for 2450 MHz | ||
| DSSS (Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum) | ||
| Protocol Stack | Core protocols (Baseband, LMP, L2CAP, SDP), RFCOMM, TCS Binary, PPP, TCP, UDP, IP, OBEX, WAE/WAP | Physical layer, MAC layer, network, security, and application |
| Frequency Hopping | Yes | No |
| Security | 128 bit AES | 128 bit AES |
| Topology | Piconet (up to 7 devices) | Star, tree, mesh (max. 65536 nodes) |
| Medium Access | FH-TDD-TDMA | CSMA/CA |
| Applications | Cable replacement, Home automation, Consumer electronics, Smart energy, Automotive | Monitoring and control, Home automation, Consumer electronics, Smart energy, Automotive |
Key Differences Explained
- Frequency Bands: Both Bluetooth and Zigbee primarily operate in the 2.4 GHz ISM band, but Zigbee also uses lower frequency bands (868 MHz, 915 MHz) in specific regions.
- Data Rate: Bluetooth generally offers higher data rates than Zigbee, making it suitable for applications requiring faster data transfer.
- Topology: Bluetooth typically uses a star topology (piconets), while Zigbee supports more complex topologies like star, tree, and mesh, allowing for larger and more robust networks.
- Power Consumption: Zigbee is designed for low power consumption, making it ideal for battery-powered devices. Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) has emerged to address this for Bluetooth as well.
- Applications: Both technologies are used in various applications, but Bluetooth is often used for audio streaming and data transfer, while Zigbee is commonly found in home automation and industrial control systems.
Advertisement
